Disclaimer: before reading this article, please understand:
the female readers needn't feel ashamed if she shows less regard for male privacy.... or, what-have-you.)
(It's important to explain what inspired this Article:
Women's Groups have spend decades harping-on issues such as assault.
And, they claim, 'every male is the rapist', etc. etc..
This is why it's necessary to clarify the myth.
If anything, males are raised into an environment where his privacy is compromised.
Therefore, since 'Women's groups' address this overall issue...
We should now understand the simple truth:
If anything, it's actually Boys who could make a valid case.)
So, the goal of this article is to prove that "Feminist Dogma" is completely invalid.
One could easily recognize general 'immodesty' stereotypes as clearly degrading to boys.
You needn't agree with any theories which claim,
he's stripped of his dignity.
However, at least the following article serves it's purpose:
finally removing the Feminized theories which claim that girls are
degraded,
sexualized,
exploited,
widely displayed,
assaulted,
and what-have-you.
In truth, society has always placed boys into a position,
where he's taught to accept nakedness while in the presence of females.
Boys have always experienced this requirement.
Whether, female relatives tell the boy to remove his dirty clothes,
while girls are present. Or, he scraped his knee, and mom examines him,
by dropping his pants. While girls are watching nearby.
There are many possibilities, which always produce the same outcome.
Therefore, 'Women's Groups' cannot possibly claim that girls are raised as 'objects'.

I'm a Men's Rights Activist.
And I'd like to discuss an age-old form of inequality.

Many families expect their sons to walk into their bedrooms wearing nothing but their underpants. While, in contrast, they buy expensive nightgowns for their daughters. Many Mothers will even insist that they simply can't afford to buy proper attire for their boys. SO, it makes “economical” sense to keep the boys walking around in their undies. I find it to be quite sad. The very same women who brought us into this world, don't feel the need to spend a few dollars on clothing. Thanks mom!

But, the implications are far reaching. We exist upon a society which gives little dignity to males. I'm especially appalled by these attitudes which suggest, boys needn't be protected by his family. Home is the one place where males should be temporarily sheltered from outside negativity. But instead, his very own family betrays him. But, they always say the same thing: “Don't worry, he'll get used to it”. And he should just be taught to become an eventual naked street-walker. Plus, we should also consider the frequent guests which may visit the common household. The Sister will invite scores of young girls dropping in, while the son in taught to act casually. Until, eventually, his appearance will seem normal to everyone. And, every son is expected to follow this immodesty. I've gathered just a few examples to demonstrate my case. Indeed: families encourage their sons to sleep in undies. Plus, they always establish how “different things are” for girls. Interestingly, most parents would never consider imposing this common law upon their daughters. After all, that would be unheard of.

Everyone deserves to be treated with the same level of respect. Therefore, the current standards should be openly discouraged by our mothers. Mom, please respect your sons.

RE: Women in Pajamas, Men naked July 26, 2007

Patricia says: Our two boys who are 12 and 8 sleep in just
boxers and won't wear a shirt even on the coldest night.

Our 10-year old daughter varies from shorts and a
tank top in the summer to pajamas the rest of the year.

MY COMMENTARY: The whole thing smells fishy, to me. Why would a mother be so anxious to prove that her sons are immodest. Let's go back to that issue of “born Vs. Bred”. I also noticed that she approached this issue in the usual fashion. Wouldn't you say, she's overdoing it, by insisting that the boys refuse to wear shirts, even on the coldest days. Ha. And, being a concerned mother, you'd think, she would force them to wear a shirt, in order to prevent pneumonia.

RE: Girls in Pajamas. Boys naked.

July 26 2007, 6:38 PM

Her statement: Yes, in every survey I've seen males outnumber female buff sleepers by a margin of 3 to 1.
I think she's just more modest.

MY RESPONSE: Why are you trying to prove this point, anyway? The real message pertains to women establishing social control through artificial modesty. In other words, she wants this stigma to exist. Also, she's suggesting, that guys are highly interested in the opposite sex, and not vice versa. "hey guys, wouldn't you like to see..... Don't you wish?

Lisa Chandler says:

I really think it has much to do with the fact:

most parents start putting their boys to bed in less clothing than their girls at an early age...

MY RESPONSE: YES YES YES... Okay, now we're beginning to unravel the truth behind it all. PARENTS teach boys to be uninhibited. This will inevitably burden him with a huge disadvantage in life.

Next comment:

When I was working as a part-time maid in Newport Beach, I never encountered a young girl sleeping without a top. On the other hand, I never encountered a young boy who was sleeping in any form of a top. Girls were 100% shirted

and boys were always 100% bare chested

My Response: here we go, again. Why are these issues taken to extremes? She "never" encountered a boy sleeping with his shirt on? Not even once? Once again: what's the point?

Next Comment:

sleep research the Netherlands the national sleep investigation has been conducted for better bed under numerous clinical studies...

My response: Once again, why would they perform such a lengthy study? Here's the reason: Their goal is to create a gap between the genders. This might seem like a paranoid conclusion, on my part. But, it's still a fully accurate presumption.

Scott thinks it's a custom for a guy to wear less. And it's taught to us, by our moms & sisters.

I think it is just the way many people in the last 40 years were raised. I lived with my mom and sister who was 10 years older than me. Both wore pajamas as did I until at the age of 8 when my sister told me boys my age usually sleep in their underwear and certainly didn't wear tops to bed. I actually didn't like the idea of not wearing my Chicago Bears pjs but my mom agreed with my sister, so I started sleeping in just underpants.

It wasn't long before I got used to not wearing much to bed and I never wore pajamas again. I'm not sure where my mom and sister got the idea, but for some reason they thought guys were supposed to sleep in very little, while they continued to wear pajamas.

MY RESPONSE: Yes, exactly. This boy is told by his mom, as well as other female family members, that he's SUPPOSED TO sleep in his underwear.

Ruby says:

Boys vs. girls

August 7 2007, 10:57 AM

The image totally fits my family as well. The boys are nude sleepers, and the girls are not.
Contrary to our daughter we deliberately no longer provided our sons with sleepwear from the age when they started secondary school. As they have been taught that sleeping in the underwear you have been wearing all day is unhealthy they gradually begin sleeping in the nude as they grew out of their last pairs of pyjamas. As a result our sons are year-round nude sleepers whereas our daughter varies from nighties in summer to pyjamas in winter.
This is a pattern seen in many families I thin

MY RESPONSE: This paragraph truly says it all. Basically: the family mentioned won't allow their sons to wear any clothing. They've probably never thought of it, this way. But, they're forcing their sons to sleep nude. That's pretty scary. Even worse, they always insist that the boys love it. And they're not the least bit offended by it. Also, did you notice the “Boys Vs. Girls” logo. This proves, the issue is being treated like a COMPETETIVE event. Also, they claim that it's unhealthy to sleep in the same pair of undies which they wore at school. Why can't they just wear a different pair. And, why doesn't this hypoallergenic rule apply to the girls, as well?

Nat says:

For whatever reason girls & women are just more bashful about nudity. Just as many girls' lockers rooms have individual shower booths while boys shower together in a big communal shower

MY RESPONSE: that's a funny statement. You're talking about a forced system of communal showering for men (while the women have more dignified booths). What does this have to do with “natural instinct”?

MY CONCLUSION FROM THIS STUDY:

sadly, Families encourage boys to sleep in their undies. I could very-well say that our mothers are sick bastards. But, we mustn't lead down that path. I could also describe them as 'betrayers' who fail to protect their sons.

This is still an example of sexism, coercion, and inequality.

Boys are raised to be less dignified than girls.

and it surely doesn't stop with this example.

But, with all said, it's difficult to understand why no one has ever addressed these issues.

Now, if you feel that most boys feel uncomfortable wearing Pajamas, He may then wear a comfortable pair of sweatpants, or shorts. Therefore, there's positively no excuse to deprive him of these necessities. CASE CLOSED.

By the way: this subject will be discussed many times, in future articles.